Facts and Procedural History Appellants Konrad Kurach and Mark Wintersteen (“Policyholders”) each purchased identical “Farmers Next Generation” insurance policies from Appellee Truck Insurance Company (“Insurer”), to cover their residential dwellings situated in Pennsylvania.1 Further, each paid Insurer an additional premium for “replacement cost coverage.”2.
[j-3a-2020 and j-3b-2020] [mo:todd, j.] in the supreme court of pennsylvania eastern district konrad kurach, appellant v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellee MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF.
Konrad Kurach and Mark Wintersteen purchased homeowner’s insurance from Truck Insurance Exchange (Truck). Kurach and Wintersteen each filed a claim with Truck Insurance Exchange, which was covered under their respective policies, for water loss damages.
Kurach v. Truck Insurance Exchange . State: Pennsylvania. Year: 2019. Case Number: 12 EAP 2019. Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania – Eastern District . … Moreover, the court has previously found that insurance companies may not deduct contractor fees from ACV when such fees are reasonably expected to occur, …
KONRAD KURACH, Appellant v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellee : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 12 EAP 2019 Appeal from the Order of Superior Court entered on August 24, 2018 at No. 1726 EDA 2017 reversing the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Civil Division, entered on April 21, 2017 at No. 00339 July Term, 2015 and remanding.
KONRAD KURACH. v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE. Appellant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF. PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1726 EDA 2017. Appeal from the Order Entered April 21, 2017. In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
